The Military Court Service

Introduction

The MCS works closely with, but is independent of, the Office of the Judge Advocate General, the Service Prosecuting Authority which is equivalent to the Crown Prosecution Service, the Service chains of command, Service and MOD personnel branches, the National Probation Service, the victim and witness services and military court advocates.

Service Court proceedings are publicised over a two week assize period. Military Court listings. All hearings are open to the public in exactly the same way as civilian courts, unless otherwise directed by the presiding judge.

Service Court results are published annually by MCS. Court Martial Results

Further information on the Court Martial, Summary Appeal Court and the Service Civilian Court can be found in the Manual of Service Law JSP 830.

CourtOrganisation

The MartialMCS is independent of the Service chains of command and Summaryis Appealstaffed Courtby Guides

Guidescivil areservants issuedemployed underby the authorityMinistry of theDefence Judgeworking Advocatefrom Generalboth andcourt centres.

To ensure independence, the Director ofMCS theis Militaryappointed Courtby Servicethe jointlyDefence Council as anCourt aidAdministration toOfficer those(CAO). whoThe practiceCAO inhas thea Servicelegislated Justicefunction System,to andgive itnotice isof court proceedings and to bespecify usedlay inmembers allof hearings.the Volumecourt 1(equivalent providesto informationjury aboutselection). procedureThese generallyduties andare itconducted dealsin accordance with allthe typesArmed ofForces proceedingsAct in2006 theand Courtrelated MartialStatutory asInstruments. The wellCAO asis ina thepermanent Summarymember Appealof Court.both Volumethe 2Service providesJustice informationBoard specificallyand forthe membersService ofJustice boards.Executive Group.

CourtThe MartialDirector andMCS Summaryoperates Appealfrom the Bulford Court GuideCentre Volsupported 1by -a AugSenior 2022Management (PDF,Team 1.52and MB,a 14Court pages)

Administration Unit. Each Court MartialCentre andhas Summarya Appealdedicated Court GuideOfficer Volwho 2is -directly Augresponsible 2022for (PDF,the 1.52day-to-day MB,management 16of pages)court proceedings, liaison with the Judiciary and court listings.

OrganisationMilitary Court Centres

There are two permanent Military Court Centres in the UK at Bulford, Wiltshire and Catterick, North Yorkshire.

Due to the draw down of British Forces Germany, the permanent court centre at Sennelager has been converted for other use but has been retained as a Court Martial location should one be required. MCS have a Court Martial capability at Episkopi, Cyprus which is due for modernisation in the near future.

The court system is entirely portable, with the ability for MCS to convene trials outside of the MCCs anywhere in the UK or elsewhere. The most recent examples have included Nightingale Courts at Tidworth and Catterick and overseas in Cyprus and Germany. MCS have recently invested in the latest Digital Audio Recording (DAR) technology to meet legal compliance for the recording of proceedings. The capability covers both the four fixed courts and two portable recording equipment sets. The Service Courts have installed the latest Digital Evidential Presentation System and are in the process of procuring technology to support the pre-recording of evidence from victims of serious sexual assault.

Procedure

The Deputy Director MCS isoversees independentthe delivery of the ServiceMCS chainsassize ofprogramme. commandCases andare islisted staffedwithin by‘assize civilsessions’, servantsheld employedat the Military Court Centres run by MCS staff. However, a particularly lengthy or complex Court Martial or Service Civilian Court case may be listed as a ‘stand-alone’ outside the Ministryassize sessions. Where possible the volume of Defencecases workingis fromequally split between both courtCourt centres.Centres.

ToBy ensuredefault, independence,cases for the DirectorRN MCSare held at Bulford, cases for the RAF isare appointedheld at Catterick and Army cases are divided between both locations. Cases of civilians subject to Service discipline are assigned on a case by case basis.

At the Defencelisting Councilphase asof case management, the Court Administrationofficer Officerwill (CAO).work Thewith CAOthe hasresident Judge Advocate to appoint a legislatedJudge functionAdvocate to giveeach noticecase.

The ofMCS courtaim proceedingsto andlist toa specifycase layfor membersan initial hearing within 28 days after receipt of directional papers from the courtService (equivalentProsecuting toAuthority.

Court juryMartial selection).and TheseSummary dutiesAppeal areCourt conductedGuides

Guides inare accordanceissued withunder the Armedauthority Forcesof Actthe 2006Judge Advocate General and relatedthe StatutoryDirector Instruments. Theof CAOthe isMilitary aCourt permanentService memberjointly ofas bothan aid to those who practice in the Service Justice BoardSystem, and it is to be used in all hearings. Volume 1 provides information about procedure generally and it deals with all types of proceedings in the ServiceCourt JusticeMartial Executiveas Group.well as in the Summary Appeal Court. Volume 2 provides information specifically for members of boards.

TheCourt DirectorMartial MCSand Summary Appeal Court Guide Vol 1 - Aug 2022 (PDF, operates1.52 fromMB, the14 Bulfordpages)

Court Martial and Summary Appeal Court CentreGuide supportedVol by2 a- SeniorAug Management2022 Team(PDF, and1.52 MB, 16 pages)

Apply for a Courttranscript Administrationof Unit.a EachService Court Centrehearing

Service hasCourt hearings are always recorded. You can apply for a dedicatedtranscript of a Service Court Officerhearing. The whocourt iscan directlyrefuse responsibleto forprovide thepart day-to-dayor managementall of courta proceedings,transcript liaison(for withexample, if details of the Judiciaryhearing are confidential).

If you wish to apply for a transcript you may download and courtfill listings.in a Transcript request form (MS Word Document, 50.6 KB).

ServiceOnce Courtcompleted proceedingsemail areyour openapplication to themcs-group@mod.gov.uk.

Transcripts publicmay attract a financial cost unless otherwiseyou directedare bya theparty presidingto judge.proceedings.

ProcedureOpen Justice: remote observation of hearings - new powers

TheFrom Deputy28 DirectorJune MCS2022, overseescourts theand deliverytribunals have new powers to allow reporters and other members of the MCSpublic assizeto programme.observe Caseshearings areremotely.

Open listedjustice withinhas ‘assizebeen sessions’,a heldfundamental atprinciple thefor Militarycenturies. CourtThe Centresprinciple runis bya MCSbroad staff.one, However,but aat particularlyits lengthycore orhas complexalways Courtbeen Martiala orright Serviceof Civilianaccess Courtto casea maypublic behearing. listedHistorically, asthis ahas ‘stand-alone’meant outsideaccess thefor assizereporters sessions.and Whereother possiblemembers of the volumepublic ofto casesthe iscourt equallyor splitother betweenroom bothin Courtwhich Centres.the hearing takes place.

ByThe default,primary caseslegislation foris contained in section 85A of the RNCourts areAct held2003 atas Bulford,inserted casesby forsection the198 RAFof arethe heldPolice, atCrime, CatterickSentencing and ArmyCourts casesAct are2022. dividedThe betweenregime bothis locations. Casesimplemented ofby civiliansthe subjectRemote toObservation Serviceand disciplineRecording are(Courts assignedand onTribunals) aRegulations case2022. byThe casepower basis.

Atis theto listing“direct phasethat ofimages caseor management,sounds of the Courtproceedings officerbe willtransmitted workelectronically”. withIt is to be exercised “for the residentpurpose Judgeof Advocateenabling topersons appointnot ataking Judgepart Advocatein the proceedings to eachwatch case.

Theor MCSlisten aimto” tothem. listIt ais casenot designed for anthose initialtaking hearingpart withinin 28the daysproceedings.

Any afterperson receiptwishing ofto directionalmake papersan fromapplication to the Military Court Service Prosecutingto Authority.

Protocolsrequest inpermission for the Serviceremote Justiceobservation Systemof (SJS)

• Protocola forhearing e-bundlescan indo theso:

  Military serviceCourt justiceService systemRemote (SJS)Observation Application

• ProtocolPractice forguidance: digitalOpen casejustice: filesremote inobservation theof servicehearings justice- systemnew (SJS)powers (PDF, 213 KB, 6 pages)

Military Court Service Strategic Plan

The MCS’s primary role is to deliver a criminal court service for the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force and in so doing, works to protect and advance the principles of justice with people’s needs and expectations at its heart.

The Service Justice System is an essential public service, relied upon by hundreds of victims and families (subject to either Service law or Service discipline), across our country and elsewhere to deliver justice outcomes that matter to them.

The decision to have a tri-Service court service with the associated ongoing support mechanisms further underlines the need to ensure the MCS has an established, integrated, and coherent strategy that will both deliver the required outputs and collaborative working arrangements.

These steps will allow the organisation to modernise, where necessary mobilise, and transform itself to be fit for purpose for the future challenges in the administration of Service Justice.

The MCS must ensure collaborative alignment with all other areas of the Service Justice System. The delivery and management of the MCS strategy seeks to create a culture of continuous service improvement and modernise court processes. The plan calls for the MCS to embrace new ways of working with technology-based systems that focus on enhancing efficiency, reducing duplicity and bureaucracy, and having platforms that directly link with partners and stakeholders to deliver a fully integrated digital case management system.

This MCS Strategic Plan is designed to highlight the relevant objectives, goals, challenges, and associated programmes across the MCS that will contribute to the continuous improvement of the organisation, its structure, processes, and culture. The integrated elements of the MCS strategy will seek to deliver core business improvement aims, develop people, invest in infrastructure, and create a vision for how the MCS will operate in the years to come.

Vision

To provide high quality services to manage the journey of the victim, witness, and defendant through the court process of the Service Justice System.

MCS will deliver this by providing a truly Independent and Impartial service.

The MCS’s key objectives are:

• Promotion of modern, fair, effective, and efficient administration of the Service Justice System.
• Achievement of best value for money.
• Continuous improvement of performance and efficiency across all aspects of the military courts’ work.
• Collaboration with the full range of Service Justice System stakeholders to improve the service provided to all those required to participate in court proceedings.
• Creation of greater confidence in, and respect for, the Service Justice System.
• Achievement of excellence as an employer.

Principal tasks

The Military Court Service is to:

• Co-ordinate, administer and provide support to all court proceedings notified by the Court Administration Officer.
• Specify such members of courts as required by law.
• Maintain a detailed and secure statistical, budgetary, and documentary record of all relevant activities.
• Support as necessary the work of the Service Justice Board and Service Justice Executive Group, which were created to write and implement policy with the aim of directing service justice in the future.
• Seek to encourage awareness of, and confidence in, the Service Justice System within the services, Ministry of Defence and wider public.
• Contribute as appropriate to the internal and external training of Service and civilian personnel involved with the Service Justice System.

The MCS strategy can be expressed by mapping three areas of focus: people, systems and processes, and buildings against those things that we know people want and need when they come into contact with the service courts.

1. The right number of trained people in whom we invest properly, and whose outstanding commitment we value and build on.

• Strive to retain and deploy our expertise so that we can run a high quality service for our users and drive transformational change.

2. Modern systems and processes, underpinned with the latest technology

• Manage performance across both court centres and respond quickly to address any performance dips.
• Roll out and deliver improved technology based systems and new ways of working in both court centres.
• Increase the capacity and capability of the courts whilst delivering an improved service for users.

3. Maintain and develop our buildings and settings to suit our new ways of working and security requirements

• Make visible and tangible improvements to court buildings by improving the way we deliver day to day maintenance, deliver enhanced security, and support our IT applications through our facilities contracts.

Open justice: remote observation of hearings - new powers

From 28 June 2022, courts and tribunals will have new powers to allow reporters and other members of the public to observe hearings remotely.

Open justice has been a fundamental principle for centuries. The principle is a broad one, but at its core has always been a right of access to a public hearing. Historically, this has meant access for reporters and other members of the public to the court or other room in which the hearing takes place.

Recently, there has been a move towards remote access. Remote observation of public hearings was first allowed by temporary provisions enacted by the Coronavirus Act 2020. Those provisions applied only to wholly video or wholly audio hearings. The temporary provisions are repealed and replaced by a new and permanent regime with expanded powers. Courts and tribunals are now able to give directions to allow remote observation of in-person and hybrid hearings as well.

The primary legislation is contained in section 85A of the Courts Act 2003 as inserted by section 198 of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. The regime is implemented by the Remote Observation and Recording (Courts and Tribunals) Regulations 2022. The power is to “direct that images or sounds of the proceedings be transmitted electronically”. It is to be exercised “for the purpose of enabling persons not taking part in the proceedings to watch or listen to” them. It is not designed for those taking part in the proceedings.

Any person wishing to make an application to the Military Court Service to request permission for the remote observation of a hearing can do so:

Military Court Service Remote Observation Application

Practice guidance:

Contact details

Court Administration Unit
Email: mcs-group@mod.gov.uk

Bulford Military Court Centre
Email: mcs-bul-groupmailbox@mod.gov.uk

Catterick Military Court Centre
Email: cmc-groupmailbox@mod.gov.uk

Court Martial Report Service
Email: mcs-cmrs-group@mod.gov.uk

Related information

• Military Court listings
• Court Martial Results
• Office of the Judge Advocate General
• Armed Forces Act 2006
• Armed Forces Act 2021
• Manual of Service Law JSP 830